Cheat Code: Try to Pay More

When I was running my little “shareware” business in college, I hired my first PR firm. Press really moved the needle for us (credibility and reach), and I wanted more. This PR firm had some very big name clients and lots of connectivity to the journalists and publications we cared about.

There was a monthly retainer, something like $10,000, and I fought hard to negotiate it down to something like $5,000. Almost immediately I was disappointed. I was getting almost nothing from them.

But of course I wasn’t. The firm only had so many favors they could call in. Should they use them on their biggest customer, or their smallest one? I was their smallest one.

I had an epiphany: Don’t negotiate down. Negotiate up. Try to be the highest paying customer.

I fired them, met with this Boston firm named fama PR, told them I wanted to be their highest paying client, and asked them point blank what that would take. I was a college kid and they probably thought this was funny, but we worked out a plan by which I’d pay them $40-$60K+/month (in 2003!) for certain performance.

If I remember correctly, we had different tiers: get us on The Today Show and that’s $10K, front page of USA Today/NYT/WSJ also $10K, lesser tier $5K, etc.

We launched this product called DidTheyReadIt in May 2004, and it was on the front page of USA Today, and then Carl Quintanilla came out to interview me for The Today Show. And many more. I still have the PR book they built of all of the appearances. It was insane.

Mission accomplished: biggest client.

The moral of the story is you get what you pay for. There are related learnings, too. The principal-agent problem is real. Shared services with no currency are hard. Let’s dive into those.

This played out many years later when hiring tech recruiters who typically take a percentage of first year salary (of the placed employee). They might take 15-30% depending on the market.

Remember what a tech recruiter does. They often find a really good candidate and peddle him/her to every company to maximize the chance of earning their fee. (In many cases, they’ll send cold emails about this — “I have 4 amazing candidates!”).

At TrialPay we once lost a REALLY good candidate and learned that our recruiter (who sent us the candidate!) was ACTIVELY selling him to reject our HIGHER offer and instead take an offer from another company! What the hell? My team was so pissed.

But of course this happened. We had smartly (and stupidly) negotiated the fee down. Let’s say we offered the engineer $150K, the other company offered the engineer $140K, and you’re the recruiter — would you rather get 30% of $140K, or 15% of $150K?

Was this unethical of the recruiter? Yes. Is this how the world works? Also yes.

You get what you pay for. The world is a competition and you are better off maximizing outputs versus minimizing inputs.

How To Sell and Raise Awareness

There are only two jobs at an early stage startup: Making the product, and selling the product. That’s it.

Here’s how to sell the product.

Contrary to popular belief and movies that lionize sales: You can’t sell until somebody is ready to buy. And you don’t know when they’re ready to buy.

Every other human brain is (to you) a random number generator. Once a year it might fire “1” (yes). Your job is to make sure you show up around this time, or are remembered such that they call YOU when it fires a “1”. Most of the time it’s a “0.” Sometimes people only change their mind when enough time has passed, irrespective of data (https://www.arampell.org/2023/09/01/when-to-escalate-vs-wait/).

Bother the person every day and they’ll get a restraining order. Hire an Ivy League kid afraid of rejection who nudges them once every 5 years, and they’ll forget who you are when their brain (or circumstances) finally says “yes.”

We consequently had a rule: everyone should hear from us once a month. You need to mix up the way people hear from you. We had light, medium, and heavy. Light might be a personalized email or forwarded news article. Medium would be an in person visit (often “I happen to be in the area…”). Heavy would be an event or gift.

This rule applied to current customers (account management), prospects (sales), and strategic partners (see my thread on selling your company: https://www.arampell.org/2023/01/04/how-to-sell-your-company/). Everyone must hear from you every month or on some regular cadence.

One year at TrialPay we were sending out very nice, customized gift boxes. It seems kind of cruel to throw away a plant (versus, say, a cheap mug or t-shirt), and nobody can kill a cactus since they can survive in a desert. So we sent everyone a cactus in a blue, dinosaur TrialPay pot. When visiting customers for years to come, I always saw that pot. When their brain said “maybe I should use that alternative payments thing” there was a cactus staring at them with our logo, and likely an email within a few weeks.

If you’re selling to somebody important, you need to remember they are overloaded and you are their last priority, but there’s a secret way in: the Executive Assistant. My dad taught me this trick. Send a nice gift to every EA every year and you’ll be stunned at the results.

The former President of PayPal once took a 6 week sabbatical and when he came back he was stunned that I was the first meeting on his calendar. We had breakfast and his first words: “How the f*** did you become the first meeting on my first day back?” I smiled.

The way to model most big company behavior: anyone can say NO, but nobody can say YES. How do you get to yes?

You need to sell horizontally; everything above applies to probably 5-10 people in the organization you are selling into. You need to prevent the NO from crashing the party.

Next: building awareness. As I’ve mentioned, normally you can’t sell to the CEO since your product is likely not one of their top priorities:

https://www.arampell.org/2018/01/13/dont-just-sell-to-the-ceo/

https://www.arampell.org/2022/12/08/the-goldilocks-zone-of-cost-irrelevance/

We had tons of competition, companies that did the exact same thing as we did, making all sorts of grandiose claims.

So my job, as CEO, was to position us and myself as an expert in the space. How? By ensuring that we became the source of truth for the press, and an “expert” to the CEO’s actual bosses: Wall Street and analysts.

Since I was trying to both make the term “transactional advertising” a thing and get through to PayPal, I reached out to every single analyst who covered eBay. Cold (and once a month until they responded!), but with lots of thoughts around where payments were going.

It was pretty cool when one of them eventually asked the CEO of eBay what his plans with transactional advertising were. “You mean…like…Alex Rampell’s company?” Boom. Inception.

The same applied for the press. I once was told that the Press never wants to be too fawning over any particular subject, such that they’d have to write something bad about Mother Teresa just to be balanced. We got great one-off standalone articles in the NYT and WSJ about us, but what now?

The answer: come up with a metric that YOU OWN. Who could uniquely talk about conversion rate for Facebook games? TrialPay! Or abandoned shopping cart rates. Etc. Thus rather than having a standalone piece, my goal was to have an “According to TrialPay…” in every single article.

And then these press pieces were fed into the “once a month” engine. You need to assume that NOBODY reads these (statistically true!), so your job is to use them as external credibility and sheepishly send them out, include them in marketing collateral, etc.

Because when you have a 5 horse race and you need to win, you need to SHOW that you’re the market leader with external validation, and you can’t get caught up in the lies of marketing collateral where everyone CLAIMS to have features X, Y, and Z or even customers A, B and C.

Lastly, for most products, there’s plenty of selling that needs to happen AFTER you’ve sold. Your existing customers should still hear from you (at least) once a month, and you should set clearly defined goals for your account management team. More on that later.

Not All SaaS is the Same

There are effectively three kinds of SaaS and it seems the (public) markets can’t tell the difference between the three with the coming AI wave.

Group 1: Software utility is not tied to heads, or if tied to heads not based on those heads delivering an outcome WITH the software. Companies can’t cut back on Workday seats because of AI! Quickbooks is used in small businesses. These systems of record will add AI features which will be accretive to revenue — think background checks for Workday, collections for QuickBooks, etc.

Group 2: AI potentially lowers # of users of the product but potentially introduces more usage? If you need fewer graphics designers you might need less Adobe licenses, but it’s possible you need more? Or the expanded output and productivity gains of AI increases usage?

Group 3: Software utility and pricing are DIRECTLY based on heads using software, where AI directly erases heads for the vertical. Zendesk falls squarely in this category. Theoretically CRM could, too. Without a pivot to outcome based pricing, these guys are in trouble.

But there’s a huge difference between the three. The best companies often have hostages, not customers — and they will maintain pricing irrespective of AI usage.

There’s another thread of “companies will vibe code their own software” but unlikely for critical systems of record where renting is cheaper than owning (hence the shift to SaaS from On Prem starting 20 years ago!)

More here on the value of filing cabinets:

https://a16z.com/ai-turns-capital-to-labor

First Principles on Lending…

Original Posted: https://x.com/arampell/status/1893883095646093315?s=20

From first principles: If you ask me to loan you $100, and I think there’s a 50% chance you don’t pay me back, I should only make the loan if I get $200 back. Otherwise, I shouldn’t make the loan! And you won’t get the loan.

The A in APR is Annual, so even if I think there’s only a 10% chance you don’t pay me back, and the loan is a week long, the APR will be enormous on a percentage basis, but only $11.11 on a dollar basis (.9 [probability] X Repayment = $100, so Repayment = $111.11)

That’s a nominal APR of 577% (or a compounded rate of 23,900%).Should that be “illegal”? If you want to restrict access to credit, then yes. I think most people would say that being able to loan their friend $100 to get back $111.11 the next week when their friend is only 90% reliable…should be perfectly fine…particularly when both parties opt in.

These headlines always miss the fact that most Americans don’t have good access to credit and more competition is the best way of lowering costs, not forcing banks to make money-losing loans (that doesn’t work!) or making it hard to start new companies to compete (the CFPB enjoyed doing that)